RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

OpenGVLab/OmniQuant

Default branch main · commit feffe8ea · scanned 6/7/2026, 9:52:07 PM

GitHub: 899 stars · 81 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface OpenGVLab/OmniQuant, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Expand topics with specific quantization techniques

    Why:

    CURRENT
    large-language-models, llm, quantization
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    large-language-models, llm, quantization, post-training-quantization, ptq, mixed-precision-quantization, gradient-free-quantization, llm-inference-optimization
  • mediumreadme#2
    Strengthen README opening with specific differentiators

    Why:

    CURRENT
    OmniQuant is a simple and powerful quantization technique for LLMs.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OmniQuant is a simple and powerful **automated, gradient-free, layer-wise mixed-precision post-training quantization (PTQ)** technique for LLMs, designed to achieve high accuracy at extremely low bit-widths.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13137

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface OpenGVLab/OmniQuant
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GPTQ
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GPTQ · recommended 2×
  2. AWQ · recommended 2×
  3. LLM.int8() · recommended 2×
  4. QLoRA · recommended 2×
  5. AutoGPTQ · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective methods for quantizing large language models to reduce memory usage?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPTQ
    2. AutoGPTQ
    3. Hugging Face `transformers`
    4. AWQ
    5. bitsandbytes
    6. LLM.int8()
    7. QLoRA
    8. Hugging Face `peft`
    9. GGML / GGUF
    10. llama.cpp
    11. text-generation-webui
    12. SmoothQuant
    13. NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM
    14. OFT

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named OpenGVLab/OmniQuant. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a quantization technique to optimize LLMs for efficient inference on mobile devices.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPTQ
    2. AWQ
    3. LLM.int8()
    4. QLoRA
    5. ONNX Runtime
    6. TensorFlow Lite
    7. Core ML Tools

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named OpenGVLab/OmniQuant. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of OpenGVLab/OmniQuant?
    pass
    AI named OpenGVLab/OmniQuant explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts OpenGVLab/OmniQuant in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named OpenGVLab/OmniQuant explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo OpenGVLab/OmniQuant solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named OpenGVLab/OmniQuant explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of OpenGVLab/OmniQuant. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenGVLab/OmniQuant.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenGVLab/OmniQuant)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/OpenGVLab/OmniQuant"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/OpenGVLab/OmniQuant.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

OpenGVLab/OmniQuant — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite