RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts

Default branch main · commit 9f164fd5 · scanned 6/17/2026, 8:56:56 PM

GitHub: 11,176 stars · 1,943 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the main title and description in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README excerpt shows Piebald promotion and images before the # Claude Code System Prompts heading.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the `# Claude Code System Prompts` heading and the descriptive sentence 'This repository contains an up-to-date list of all Claude Code's various system prompts and their associated token counts...' to the very top of the README, before any promotional content for Piebald.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add broader, more descriptive topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    claude-code, claude-code-system-prompts, system-prompts
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude-code, claude-code-system-prompts, system-prompts, prompt-engineering, ai-agents, llm-prompts, developer-tools
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://piebald.ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GPT-4
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  2. Claude 3 Opus · recommended 1×
  3. Llama 3 · recommended 1×
  4. Gemini Advanced · recommended 1×
  5. Claude 3 Sonnet · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective system prompt strategies for building sophisticated AI coding assistants?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4
    2. Claude 3 Opus
    3. Llama 3
    4. Gemini Advanced
    5. Claude 3 Sonnet
    6. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    7. Python Black
    8. Pylint
    9. Gemini 1.5 Pro
    10. GPT-4 Turbo
    11. Claude 3
    12. Python 3.10
    13. FastAPI
    14. SQLAlchemy 2.0
    15. Pydantic

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking examples of prompts for AI agent planning, exploration, and task execution.
    you: not recommended
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts?
    pass
    AI did not name Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite