RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow

Default branch main · commit f3de74d8 · scanned 6/22/2026, 8:43:16 AM

GitHub: 3,774 stars · 265 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude-ai, code-generation, ai-workflow, spec-driven-development, bug-fix-automation, developer-tools, ai-coding-assistant, workflow-automation
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README opening to clearly state core function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > **⚠️ IMPORTANT NOTICE:** Development focus has shifted to the **MCP (Model Context Protocol) version** of this workflow system. The MCP version provides enhanced features, real-time dashboard, and broader AI tool compatibility.
    >
    > **🚀 View the new Spec Workflow MCP →**
    >
    > This Claude Code-specific version remains available for existing users but will receive limited updates.
    
    [](https://badge.fury.io/js/@pimzino%2Fclaude-code-spec-workflow)
    [](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
    
    **Automated workflows for Claude Code with intelligent task execution.**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow provides automated, AI-driven workflows for Claude Code, enabling structured spec-driven development and streamlined bug fixes.**
    
    > **⚠️ IMPORTANT NOTICE:** Development focus has shifted to the **MCP (Model Context Protocol) version** of this workflow system. The MCP version provides enhanced features, real-time dashboard, and broader AI tool compatibility.
    >
    > **🚀 View the new Spec Workflow MCP →**
    >
    > This Claude Code-specific version remains available for existing users but will receive limited updates.
    
    [](https://badge.fury.io/js/@pimzino%2Fclaude-code-spec-workflow)
    [](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Insert URL for the new Spec Workflow MCP version, as referenced in the README]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Storybook
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Storybook · recommended 1×
  2. Figma · recommended 1×
  3. Zeplin · recommended 1×
  4. Anima · recommended 1×
  5. Supernova · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a tool to automate spec-driven feature development from design to implementation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Storybook
    2. Figma
    3. Zeplin
    4. Anima
    5. Supernova
    6. Nx
    7. Backstage

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automate the bug fix workflow, from issue analysis to verification?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Jira Software
    2. Automation for Jira
    3. ScriptRunner for Jira
    4. GitHub
    5. GitLab
    6. Bitbucket
    7. Zephyr Scale
    8. Xray Test Management for Jira
    9. Jenkins
    10. GitHub Actions
    11. GitLab CI/CD
    12. GitHub Issues
    13. GitLab Issues
    14. Azure DevOps
    15. Azure Boards
    16. Azure Repos
    17. Azure Pipelines
    18. Azure Test Plans
    19. Linear
    20. ClickUp

    AI recommended 20 alternatives but never named Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow?
    pass
    AI did not name Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite