RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

QmiAI/Qmedia

Default branch main · commit c890b254 · scanned 5/29/2026, 8:33:40 PM

GitHub: 624 stars · 74 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface QmiAI/Qmedia, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H3 to clarify its role as a complete AI search platform

    Why:

    CURRENT
    AI content search engine designed specifically for content creators.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A complete, local-first AI content search platform for creators to privately search and Q&A their image, text, and video assets.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics for multi-modal RAG applications and local deployment

    Why:

    CURRENT
    content, content-search, rag, search, search-engine, video
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    content, content-search, rag, search, search-engine, video, multimodal-rag, local-ai, ai-for-creators, private-ai, content-creation-tools
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a link to a project website, demo, or documentation portal (e.g., `https://qmia.ai/qmedia` or `https://docs.qmia.ai/qmedia`).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface QmiAI/Qmedia
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Weaviate
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Weaviate · recommended 2×
  2. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 2×
  3. Elasticsearch · recommended 1×
  4. Pinecone · recommended 1×
  5. Milvus · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build a private multi-modal search engine for my creative assets?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Weaviate
    2. Elasticsearch
    3. Pinecone
    4. Milvus
    5. Faiss
    6. Hugging Face Transformers
    7. PostgreSQL
    8. pgvector
    9. OpenSearch

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named QmiAI/Qmedia. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools enable local RAG for image and video content with an LLM?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LlamaIndex
    2. CLIP
    3. OpenCLIP
    4. BLIP-2
    5. Chroma
    6. FAISS
    7. LangChain
    8. Hugging Face Transformers
    9. Qdrant
    10. Weaviate
    11. Ollama
    12. LLaVA
    13. BakLLaVA
    14. PyTorch
    15. TensorFlow
    16. Annoy
    17. OpenVINO
    18. ONNX Runtime

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named QmiAI/Qmedia. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of QmiAI/Qmedia?
    pass
    AI named QmiAI/Qmedia explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts QmiAI/Qmedia in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named QmiAI/Qmedia explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo QmiAI/Qmedia solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named QmiAI/Qmedia explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of QmiAI/Qmedia. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/QmiAI/Qmedia.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/QmiAI/Qmedia)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/QmiAI/Qmedia"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/QmiAI/Qmedia.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

QmiAI/Qmedia — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite