RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

QwenLM/QwQ

Default branch main · commit 620a5ead · scanned 6/1/2026, 2:32:14 AM

GitHub: 516 stars · 26 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface QwenLM/QwQ, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the README's H1 to emphasize reasoning specialization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # QwQ
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # QwQ: Reasoning-Specialized Large Language Model Series
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwq-32b/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface QwenLM/QwQ
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GPT-4
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GPT-4 · recommended 2×
  2. Claude 3 Opus · recommended 2×
  3. Gemini 1.5 Pro · recommended 2×
  4. Llama 3 · recommended 2×
  5. Mistral Large · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Which AI models are best for applications requiring strong analytical reasoning capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4
    2. Claude 3 Opus
    3. Gemini 1.5 Pro
    4. Llama 3
    5. Mistral Large

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named QwenLM/QwQ. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a specialized language model to handle complex problem-solving and critical thinking tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4
    2. Claude 3 Opus
    3. Gemini 1.5 Pro
    4. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    5. Llama 3

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named QwenLM/QwQ. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of QwenLM/QwQ?
    pass
    AI named QwenLM/QwQ explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts QwenLM/QwQ in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named QwenLM/QwQ explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo QwenLM/QwQ solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named QwenLM/QwQ explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of QwenLM/QwQ. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/QwenLM/QwQ.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/QwenLM/QwQ)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/QwenLM/QwQ"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/QwenLM/QwQ.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

QwenLM/QwQ — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite