RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot

Default branch main · commit a99abd43 · scanned 5/13/2026, 6:58:32 AM

GitHub: 1,131 stars · 106 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clarify it's a ready-to-use bot

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Telegram ChatGPT Concierge Bot (+ Voice!)

[](https://railway.app/template/e7XF13?referralCode=eZ-TPi)

This is a Telegram bot that uses:
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Telegram ChatGPT Concierge Bot (+ Voice!)

[](https://railway.app/template/e7XF13?referralCode=eZ-TPi)

This repository provides a ready-to-deploy Telegram bot that lets users interact with OpenAI's ChatGPT via text and voice. It uses:
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
RasaHQ/rasa
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. RasaHQ/rasa · recommended 1×
  2. Google Dialogflow · recommended 1×
  3. microsoft/botframework-sdk · recommended 1×
  4. Amazon Lex · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a framework to build a voice-interactive AI assistant on a popular chat application.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rasa (RasaHQ/rasa)
    2. Google Dialogflow
    3. Microsoft Bot Framework (microsoft/botframework-sdk)
    4. Amazon Lex
    5. OpenAI API

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to integrate an advanced language model into a messaging bot, retaining conversation context?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT
    2. Anthropic Claude
    3. Google Gemini
    4. Meta Llama
    5. Redis
    6. PostgreSQL
    7. MySQL
    8. MongoDB
    9. DynamoDB
    10. LangChain
    11. LlamaIndex
    12. Twilio
    13. Slack API
    14. Telegram Bot API
    15. Microsoft Bot Framework

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot?
    pass
    AI named RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

RafalWilinski/telegram-chatgpt-concierge-bot — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite