RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

RahulSChand/gpu_poor

Default branch main · commit ad2fc0ef · scanned 6/29/2026, 12:07:13 PM

GitHub: 1,402 stars · 89 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface RahulSChand/gpu_poor, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify its estimation/prediction role

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Can my GPU run this LLM? & at what token/s?
    
    Calculates how much **GPU memory you need** and how much **token/s you can get** for any LLM & GPU/CPU.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # LLM GPU Poor: Predict & Estimate LLM Performance and Memory
    
    This tool accurately *predicts* and *estimates* the **GPU memory requirements** and **token/s throughput** for any Large Language Model (LLM) on your specific GPU/CPU hardware. It helps you determine if your GPU can run an LLM and what performance to expect, rather than being a runtime or optimization library.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a standard open-source license file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a `LICENSE` file to the repository root containing the text of the MIT License.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics related to LLM performance estimation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ggml, gpu, huggingface, language-model, llama, llama2, llamacpp, llm, pytorch, quantization
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ggml, gpu, huggingface, language-model, llama, llama2, llamacpp, llm, pytorch, quantization, llm-performance, gpu-memory-estimation, performance-prediction, llm-calculator

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface RahulSChand/gpu_poor
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
microsoft/DeepSpeed
Recommended in 3 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. microsoft/DeepSpeed · recommended 3×
  2. NVIDIA Nsight Systems · recommended 2×
  3. microsoft/onnxruntime · recommended 2×
  4. huggingface/optimum · recommended 2×
  5. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to estimate GPU memory and inference speed for large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    2. DeepSpeed (microsoft/DeepSpeed)
    3. NVIDIA Nsight Systems
    4. PyTorch (pytorch/pytorch)
    5. NVIDIA TensorRT
    6. ONNX Runtime (microsoft/onnxruntime)
    7. DeepSpeed-Inference (microsoft/DeepSpeed)
    8. vLLM (vllm-project/vllm)
    9. Hugging Face Optimum (huggingface/optimum)
    10. bitsandbytes (TimDettmers/bitsandbytes)
    11. AWQ (mit-han-lab/awq)
    12. GPTQ (IST-DASLab/gptq)
    13. cProfile
    14. FlashAttention (Dao-AILab/flash-attention)
    15. xFormers (facebookresearch/xformers)

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named RahulSChand/gpu_poor. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to predict LLM performance with different quantization methods on my hardware?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Optimum (huggingface/optimum)
    2. ONNX Runtime (microsoft/onnxruntime)
    3. NVIDIA TensorRT (NVIDIA/TensorRT)
    4. MLPerf Inference Benchmarks (mlcommons/inference)
    5. DeepSpeed (microsoft/DeepSpeed)
    6. Megatron-LM (NVIDIA/Megatron-LM)
    7. PyTorch Profiler
    8. TensorFlow Profiler
    9. NVIDIA Nsight Systems
    10. Nsight Compute
    11. Intel Neural Compressor (intel/neural-compressor)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named RahulSChand/gpu_poor. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of RahulSChand/gpu_poor?
    pass
    AI named RahulSChand/gpu_poor explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts RahulSChand/gpu_poor in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named RahulSChand/gpu_poor explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo RahulSChand/gpu_poor solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named RahulSChand/gpu_poor explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of RahulSChand/gpu_poor. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/RahulSChand/gpu_poor.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/RahulSChand/gpu_poor)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/RahulSChand/gpu_poor"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/RahulSChand/gpu_poor.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

RahulSChand/gpu_poor — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite