RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Rheosoph/flow-like

Default branch dev · commit e6496b71 · scanned 6/13/2026, 8:36:54 AM

GitHub: 899 stars · 71 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Rheosoph/flow-like, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify core technology and purpose in README's opening paragraph

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Flow-Like is a **visual workflow automation platform** that runs entirely on your hardware. Build workflows with drag-and-drop blocks, run them on your laptop, phone, or server, and get a clear record of where data came from, what changed, and what came out — no cloud dependency, no black boxes, no guesswork.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Flow-Like is a **Rust-powered visual workflow automation platform** that runs entirely on your hardware. Build strongly typed workflows with drag-and-drop blocks, run them on your laptop, phone, or server, and get a clear record of where data came from, what changed, and what came out — no cloud dependency, no black boxes, no guesswork.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics for enterprise and self-hosted workflow automation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, ai, apis, automation, data-flow, development, llm, low-code, mcp, mcp-client, mcp-server, no-code, rust, self-hosted, typed, typescript, visual-scripting, workflow, workflow-automation
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, ai, apis, automation, data-flow, development, llm, low-code, mcp, mcp-client, mcp-server, no-code, rust, self-hosted, typed, typescript, visual-scripting, workflow, workflow-automation, enterprise-workflow, workflow-engine, high-performance, ai-workflow, on-premise
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a clear statement about the project's license(s) to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
    Flow-Like is released under [describe the license(s) here, e.g., 'a custom license available in the LICENSE file' or 'a dual-license model (MIT/Apache-2.0) as detailed in the LICENSE file']. Please refer to the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Rheosoph/flow-like
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Apache Airflow
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Apache Airflow · recommended 2×
  2. Prefect · recommended 2×
  3. Camunda Platform · recommended 1×
  4. Temporal · recommended 1×
  5. Activiti · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best self-hosted visual workflow automation platforms for enterprise applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Camunda Platform
    2. Apache Airflow
    3. Temporal
    4. Activiti
    5. n8n
    6. Prefect

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Rheosoph/flow-like. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build strongly typed AI-powered workflows using a high-performance engine?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Temporal.io
    2. Prefect
    3. Apache Airflow
    4. Kubeflow Pipelines
    5. AWS Step Functions
    6. Azure Data Factory
    7. Azure Machine Learning Pipelines

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Rheosoph/flow-like. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Rheosoph/flow-like?
    pass
    AI named Rheosoph/flow-like explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Rheosoph/flow-like in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Rheosoph/flow-like explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Rheosoph/flow-like solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Rheosoph/flow-like explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Rheosoph/flow-like. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Rheosoph/flow-like.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Rheosoph/flow-like)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Rheosoph/flow-like"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Rheosoph/flow-like.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Rheosoph/flow-like — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite