RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper

Default branch main · commit 74951748 · scanned 6/5/2026, 11:32:01 AM

GitHub: 553 stars · 111 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the text of the MIT License (or your chosen open-source license).
  • mediumreadme#2
    Enhance the README's opening paragraph for broader context

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An OpenAI API-compatible wrapper for Claude Code, allowing you to use Claude Code with any OpenAI client library. **Now powered by the official Claude Agent SDK v0.1.18** with enhanced authentication and features.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An OpenAI API-compatible wrapper for Claude Code, enabling seamless integration of Anthropic's Claude models with any existing OpenAI client library or application. This project bridges the gap, allowing developers to leverage Claude's capabilities without rewriting their OpenAI-centric codebases. **Now powered by the official Claude Agent SDK v0.1.18** with enhanced authentication and features.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LiteLLM
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LiteLLM · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 2×
  3. OpenRouter · recommended 1×
  4. Helicone · recommended 1×
  5. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use Anthropic models with existing OpenAI API client libraries?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LiteLLM
    2. OpenRouter
    3. Helicone
    4. LangChain
    5. LlamaIndex

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What is the best way to make a non-OpenAI LLM service compatible with OpenAI's API?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LiteLLM
    2. OpenRouter.ai
    3. LocalAI
    4. FastChat
    5. LangChain
    6. NGINX
    7. Flask
    8. Express.js

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper?
    pass
    AI named RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

RichardAtCT/claude-code-openai-wrapper — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite