RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent

Default branch main · commit bc85a456 · scanned 5/14/2026, 10:11:52 AM

GitHub: 4,345 stars · 605 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to highlight core function and performance

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with an H1 followed by '📣 New tutorial on building minimal AI agents'.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # The minimal AI software engineering agent

The 100 line AI agent that solves GitHub issues or helps you in your command line. Radically simple, no huge configs, no giant monorepo—but scores >74% on SWE-bench verified!

📣 New tutorial on building minimal AI agents
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, agentic-ai, agentic-ai-cli, ai, ai-agent, textual
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, agentic-ai, agentic-ai-cli, ai, ai-agent, textual, software-engineering, swe-bench, code-autofix, issue-resolution
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## How is mini-swe-agent different?

Unlike general coding assistants (e.g., GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Tabnine) or broad AI agent frameworks (e.g., Auto-GPT), mini-swe-agent is an autonomous, minimal agent specifically designed to *solve* software engineering tasks and GitHub issues. It focuses on high performance on benchmarks like SWE-bench with a radically simple, 100-line core, rather than providing code completion or general assistance.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Cursor
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Cursor · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. smol-ai/smol-developer · recommended 1×
  5. Auto-GPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a minimal AI agent for automating software engineering and development workflows.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. GitHub Copilot
    3. OpenAI API
    4. smol-ai/smol-developer (smol-ai/smol-developer)
    5. Auto-GPT
    6. BabyAGI
    7. CodiumAI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a performant, lightweight AI assistant to resolve code issues quickly.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Cursor
    3. Tabnine
    4. Codeium
    5. Replit AI
    6. Phind

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent?
    pass
    AI named SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

SWE-agent/mini-swe-agent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite