RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

SawyerHood/dev-browser

Default branch main · commit 9c85e469 · scanned 5/11/2026, 2:21:37 AM

GitHub: 6,072 stars · 390 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface SawyerHood/dev-browser, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to emphasize AI agent focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A browser automation tool that lets AI agents and developers control browsers with sandboxed JavaScript scripts.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A sandboxed browser automation tool designed specifically to empower AI agents (like Claude) with web browsing capabilities. It allows AI agents to control browsers with sandboxed JavaScript scripts, enabling programmatic interaction with websites.
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics for AI agents and web interaction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ["claude-code", "playwright", "skills"]
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["ai-agents", "web-browsing", "claude-skill", "browser-automation", "playwright", "sandboxed-execution"]
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/SawyerHood/dev-browser

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface SawyerHood/dev-browser
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
SeleniumHQ/selenium
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 2×
  2. microsoft/playwright · recommended 2×
  3. puppeteer/puppeteer · recommended 2×
  4. crummy/BeautifulSoup · recommended 1×
  5. scrapy/scrapy · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I enable an AI agent to programmatically interact with websites and perform actions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    2. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    3. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    4. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup)
    5. Scrapy (scrapy/scrapy)
    6. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    7. Robocorp

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named SawyerHood/dev-browser. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools provide sandboxed browser automation for integrating web access into AI systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    3. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    4. Browserless
    5. Headless Chrome

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named SawyerHood/dev-browser. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of SawyerHood/dev-browser?
    pass
    AI named SawyerHood/dev-browser explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts SawyerHood/dev-browser in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name SawyerHood/dev-browser — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo SawyerHood/dev-browser solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named SawyerHood/dev-browser explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of SawyerHood/dev-browser. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/SawyerHood/dev-browser.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/SawyerHood/dev-browser)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/SawyerHood/dev-browser"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/SawyerHood/dev-browser.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

SawyerHood/dev-browser — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite