RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV

Default branch main · commit 17013cb5 · scanned 5/30/2026, 7:22:11 AM

GitHub: 1,087 stars · 47 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening sentence to explicitly state academic app category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    OpenScholarXIV is a free and open-source app for finding, reading, bookmarking, summarizing, and discussing arXiv papers with AI.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OpenScholarXIV is an **academic research mobile app** for finding, reading, bookmarking, summarizing, and discussing arXiv papers with AI.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    arxiv, academic-papers, ai-summarization, mobile-app, android, research-tool, generative-ai, llm, paper-reader
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Set the repository homepage to the releases page

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV/releases

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LlamaIndex
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. deepset/Haystack · recommended 1×
  4. Paperless-ngx · recommended 1×
  5. DocArray · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to find an open-source tool for AI-powered summarization and chat with research papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LlamaIndex
    2. LangChain
    3. Haystack (deepset/Haystack)
    4. Paperless-ngx
    5. DocArray
    6. Gradio

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source mobile app helps read, bookmark, and manage arXiv academic papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PaperShip
    2. Arxiv Mobile
    3. Sci-Hub
    4. Zotero
    5. ReadEra

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV?
    pass
    AI named ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ScholarXIV/OpenScholarXIV — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite