RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App

Default branch main · commit e3e4a23a · scanned 5/27/2026, 11:11:34 PM

GitHub: 1,078 stars · 47 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify app name and purpose in README intro

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ScholArxiv is an open-source, aesthetic and minimal app that allows users to search, read, bookmark, share, download and view summaries of academic papers from the arXiv repository.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ScholArxiv (an academic paper management app, distinct from Final Fantasy XIV tools) is an open-source, aesthetic and minimal app that allows users to search, read, bookmark, share, download and view summaries of academic papers from the arXiv repository.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant GitHub topics

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    arxiv, academic-papers, ai-powered, summarization, chat-bot, research-tool, paper-reader, open-source, android-app, mobile-app, kotlin, jetpack-compose
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a project homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 1×
  2. SciSpace · recommended 1×
  3. Humata AI · recommended 1×
  4. ChatPDF · recommended 1×
  5. Paperpile · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good tools for AI-powered summarization and chat interaction with academic papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. SciSpace
    3. Humata AI
    4. ChatPDF
    5. Paperpile
    6. Semantic Scholar
    7. ChatGPT

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need an app to search, read, and organize arXiv preprints with download and bookmark features.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Papership
    2. ArXiv Mobile
    3. Mendeley
    4. Zotero
    5. ReadCube Papers
    6. arXiv.org
    7. Zotero Connector
    8. Mendeley Web Importer

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App?
    pass
    AI named ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ScholarXIV/ScholarXIV-App — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite