RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow

Default branch main · commit 24847ff7 · scanned 6/7/2026, 1:12:40 AM

GitHub: 864 stars · 149 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
10 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
0 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the root directory with the text of the MIT License.
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen README's opening differentiator

    Why:

    CURRENT
    💡 这是什么？

Vibe Writing 不是一个AI写作助手，而是一个思维协同系统。

核心理念：以人为主体 —— 这是你的主题，AI是你的思维伙伴。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    💡 这是什么？

Vibe Writing 是一个**以人为中心的思维协同系统**，而非传统的AI写作助手。它赋能你掌控创作流程，将AI作为你的智能伙伴，激发灵感、优化结构、润色语言，确保最终作品完全体现你的思想和风格。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Jasper
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Jasper · recommended 2×
  2. Sudowrite · recommended 1×
  3. Jarvis.ai · recommended 1×
  4. NovelAI · recommended 1×
  5. ShortlyAI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI writing tools empower me to control the narrative and structure, not just edit?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Sudowrite
    2. Jasper
    3. Jarvis.ai
    4. NovelAI
    5. ShortlyAI
    6. Campfire Pro
    7. Blaze
    8. AI Dungeon
    9. Latitude.sh
    10. Voyage

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI assistant to help organize my thoughts into structured articles and refine drafts.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT (GPT-4)
    2. Claude (Opus/Sonnet)
    3. Notion AI
    4. Google Gemini (Advanced)
    5. Copy.ai
    6. Jasper

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow?
    pass
    AI did not name Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Tasihi89/vibe-writing-workflow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite