RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co

Default branch master · commit 297ba595 · scanned 6/19/2026, 11:37:57 AM

GitHub: 2,134 stars · 241 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT License) in the repository root to clearly state the terms of use for the content.
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README H1 to emphasize 'awesome list' type

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Awesome Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Resources
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Awesome List of Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Papers and Resources
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with specific sub-domains

    Why:

    CURRENT
    combinatorial-optimization, machine-learning, operations-research, paper-list
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    combinatorial-optimization, machine-learning, operations-research, paper-list, reinforcement-learning, graph-neural-networks, travelling-salesman-problem, job-shop-scheduling, np-hard-problems

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learning
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learning · recommended 1×
  2. Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems! · recommended 1×
  3. Learning Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms over Graphs · recommended 1×
  4. Learning to Branch · recommended 1×
  5. Large Language Models as Optimizers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the latest research papers applying machine learning to combinatorial optimization challenges?
    you: not recommended
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for academic resources on using AI to solve NP-hard problems like TSP or JSSP.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learning
    2. Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!
    3. Learning Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms over Graphs
    4. Learning to Branch
    5. Large Language Models as Optimizers
    6. GPT-3.5
    7. GPT-4
    8. Solving Combinatorial Optimization Problems with Language Models
    9. Combining Reinforcement Learning and Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization
    10. Genetic Algorithms (GAs) with Neural Network-based Local Search
    11. Learning to Search with Deep Reinforcement Learning

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co?
    pass
    AI did not name Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Thinklab-SJTU/awesome-ml4co — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite