RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam

Default branch master · commit 17f66e3f · scanned 5/25/2026, 1:12:50 AM

GitHub: 4,205 stars · 726 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README to clarify it's a curated GitHub knowledge base

    Why:

    CURRENT
    📖 一个攻防知识库。_A knowledge base for red teaming and offensive security._
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    📖 This repository is a comprehensive, curated knowledge base and collection of practical guides, cheat sheets, and scripts for red teaming and offensive security professionals, hosted directly on GitHub.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) that aligns with the project's intent.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL (e.g., a project website, a documentation portal, or even the GitHub repo URL itself if no external site exists) to the 'Homepage' field in the repository settings.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
MITRE ATT&CK Framework
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. MITRE ATT&CK Framework · recommended 1×
  2. Red Team Operations: A Practical Guide to Ethical Hacking by Joe Vest and Gary Hall · recommended 1×
  3. Mandiant · recommended 1×
  4. CrowdStrike · recommended 1×
  5. Hack The Box · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive knowledge base for red team operations and offensive security?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MITRE ATT&CK Framework
    2. Red Team Operations: A Practical Guide to Ethical Hacking by Joe Vest and Gary Hall
    3. Mandiant
    4. CrowdStrike
    5. Hack The Box
    6. TryHackMe
    7. Offensive Security (OffSec)
    8. SANS Institute
    9. Awesome-Red-Teaming

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for practical guides and scripts covering initial access and command and control techniques.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Metasploit Framework
    2. Cobalt Strike
    3. Empire (Starkiller GUI)
    4. Covenant
    5. Sliver C2
    6. PoshC2
    7. Mythic C2

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam?
    pass
    AI named Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Threekiii/Awesome-Redteam — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite