RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Topdu/OpenOCR

Default branch main · commit 0d522801 · scanned 6/1/2026, 4:21:58 AM

GitHub: 1,356 stars · 128 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Topdu/OpenOCR, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify OpenOCR's scope in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    OpenOCR is an open-source toolkit developed by the OCR team from FVL Lab, Fudan University, under the guidance of Prof. Yu-Gang Jiang and Prof. Zhineng Chen. It focuses on 「General-OCR」 tasks, including **Text Detection and Recognition, Formula and Table Recognition**, as well as **Document Parsing and Understanding**. The toolkit integrates a unified training and evaluation benchmark, commercial-grade OCR and Document Parsing systems, and faithful reproductions of the core implementations from a wide range of academic papers.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OpenOCR is a comprehensive open-source toolkit for General-OCR research and applications, developed by the OCR team from FVL Lab, Fudan University. **It is not merely a wrapper for existing OCR engines like Tesseract, but a full-fledged platform** integrating a unified training and evaluation benchmark, commercial-grade OCR and Document Parsing systems, and faithful reproductions of core implementations from a wide range of academic papers. OpenOCR focuses on tasks including Text Detection and Recognition, Formula and Table Recognition, and Document Parsing and Understanding.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics to include specific advanced features

    Why:

    CURRENT
    chineseocr, document-analysis, document-parsing, document-processing, ocr, ocr-pytorch, scene-text-detection, scene-text-recognition
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    chineseocr, document-analysis, document-parsing, document-processing, ocr, ocr-pytorch, scene-text-detection, scene-text-recognition, table-recognition, formula-recognition, document-understanding, ocr-toolkit, research-platform
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Insert official project homepage URL here, e.g., a dedicated project website or FVL Lab page]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Topdu/OpenOCR
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Tesseract OCR
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Tesseract OCR · recommended 1×
  2. PaddleOCR · recommended 1×
  3. OCRmyPDF · recommended 1×
  4. EasyOCR · recommended 1×
  5. Surya · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source OCR toolkit for general document analysis and text recognition.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Tesseract OCR
    2. PaddleOCR
    3. OCRmyPDF
    4. EasyOCR
    5. Surya

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named Topdu/OpenOCR. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a robust library for document parsing, including table and formula recognition.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Apache Tika (apache/tika)
    2. PDFMiner.six (pdfminer/pdfminer.six)
    3. Camelot (camelot-dev/camelot)
    4. Mathpix OCR
    5. Nougat (facebookresearch/nougat)
    6. Tabula-py (tabulapdf/tabula-py)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Topdu/OpenOCR. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Topdu/OpenOCR?
    pass
    AI named Topdu/OpenOCR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Topdu/OpenOCR in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Topdu/OpenOCR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Topdu/OpenOCR solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Topdu/OpenOCR explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Topdu/OpenOCR. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Topdu/OpenOCR.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Topdu/OpenOCR)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Topdu/OpenOCR"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Topdu/OpenOCR.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Topdu/OpenOCR — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite