RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals

Default branch main · commit 54f59b9d · scanned 6/3/2026, 9:52:01 AM

GitHub: 523 stars · 341 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm-evaluation, ai-safety, generative-ai, machine-learning, benchmarks, uk-government, inspect-ai
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening sentence for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Welcome to **Inspect Evals**, a repository of community contributed LLM evaluations for Inspect AI.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Inspect Evals** is a collection of community-contributed evaluations for Inspect AI, specifically designed to assess the performance and safety of Large Language Models (LLMs).
  • mediumabout#3
    Update the repository description to be more explicit

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Collection of evals for Inspect AI
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A collection of community-contributed evaluations for Inspect AI, focused on assessing the performance and safety of Large Language Models (LLMs).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LLM-Evals
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LLM-Evals · recommended 1×
  2. LangChain Evaluation · recommended 1×
  3. Hugging Face Evaluate · recommended 1×
  4. DeepMind's Safety and Ethics Frameworks · recommended 1×
  5. Cleanlab · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I effectively evaluate the performance and safety of large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LLM-Evals
    2. LangChain Evaluation
    3. Hugging Face Evaluate
    4. DeepMind's Safety and Ethics Frameworks
    5. Cleanlab
    6. Microsoft's Counterfit
    7. Label Studio
    8. Prodigy

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find community-contributed benchmarks and evaluations for AI models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Hub
    2. Papers With Code
    3. MLPerf
    4. Kaggle
    5. GitHub

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals?
    pass
    AI named UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_evals — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite