RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office

Default branch main · commit 64be23d9 · scanned 6/11/2026, 7:02:22 AM

GitHub: 611 stars · 108 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to clarify project category and avoid 'Microsoft Office' confusion

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # OpenClaw Office
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # OpenClaw Office: A Visual Monitoring & Skills Development Platform for Multi-Agent AI Systems (Not for Microsoft Office)
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    multi-agent-systems, ai-agents, agent-orchestration, skills-development, visual-monitoring, dashboard, ai-chatbots, virtual-office, frontend
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
NetLogo
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. NetLogo · recommended 1×
  2. Mesa · recommended 1×
  3. GAMA Platform · recommended 1×
  4. Anylogic · recommended 1×
  5. Unity · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a platform to visualize and manage multi-agent AI system collaboration.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. NetLogo
    2. Mesa
    3. GAMA Platform
    4. Anylogic
    5. Unity
    6. MATLAB
    7. Repast Simphony

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best tools for building and deploying reusable skills for AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    4. OpenAI Assistants API
    5. Haystack
    6. AutoGPT/BabyAGI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office?
    pass
    AI did not name WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

WW-AI-Lab/openclaw-office — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite