RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Waishnav/devspace

Default branch main · commit fa2f7eea · scanned 6/22/2026, 12:21:55 AM

GitHub: 1,899 stars · 185 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Waishnav/devspace, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Refine the 'About' description for clarity and keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Turn ChatGPT into Codex and enjoy 2x rate limits :)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Securely connect ChatGPT to your local machine for Codex-style code editing, execution, and file access, enhancing AI-assisted development.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/Waishnav/devspace

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Waishnav/devspace
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Continue.dev
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Continue.dev · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI API with Function Calling · recommended 1×
  3. Cursor IDE · recommended 1×
  4. Llama.cpp · recommended 1×
  5. Ollama · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I let an AI assistant securely interact with my local codebase for development tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API with Function Calling
    2. Continue.dev
    3. Cursor IDE
    4. Llama.cpp
    5. Ollama
    6. Docker
    7. Git

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Waishnav/devspace. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow AI to edit and run code on my machine without uploading project files?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. VS Code
    3. GitHub Copilot Chat
    4. Codeium
    5. Tabnine
    6. Continue.dev
    7. Open Interpreter
    8. GPT-Engineer
    9. Smol-Developer
    10. Aider
    11. Devin

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named Waishnav/devspace. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Waishnav/devspace?
    pass
    AI named Waishnav/devspace explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Waishnav/devspace in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Waishnav/devspace explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Waishnav/devspace solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Waishnav/devspace explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Waishnav/devspace. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Waishnav/devspace.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Waishnav/devspace)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Waishnav/devspace"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Waishnav/devspace.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Waishnav/devspace — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite