RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers

Default branch main · commit 68a8406a · scanned 6/3/2026, 8:07:42 PM

GitHub: 554 stars · 37 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to clarify the repo's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # LLM RL Papers
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # LLM & RL Papers: A Curated Collection for Control Applications
  • hightopics#2
    Refine and correct repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    control, docs, llm, papers, reinfrocement-learning
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    control, llm, papers, reinforcement-learning, curated-list, robotics, game-agents
  • highlicense#3
    Add a standard open-source license file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, for example, with the CC-BY-4.0 license text, which is suitable for content collections.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
arXiv
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. arXiv · recommended 1×
  2. Google Scholar · recommended 1×
  3. NeurIPS (Neural Information Processing Systems) Proceedings · recommended 1×
  4. ICLR (International Conference on Learning Representations) Proceedings · recommended 1×
  5. Google DeepMind · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find recent research papers on combining large language models with reinforcement learning for control?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. arXiv
    2. Google Scholar
    3. NeurIPS (Neural Information Processing Systems) Proceedings
    4. ICLR (International Conference on Learning Representations) Proceedings
    5. Google DeepMind
    6. OpenAI
    7. Meta AI
    8. Stanford AI Lab (SAIL)
    9. UC Berkeley AI Research (BAIR)
    10. Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) Proceedings
    11. IEEE Transactions on Robotics (TRO)
    12. International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the latest advancements in using large language models to enhance reinforcement learning for robotics?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. SayCan
    2. Inner Monologue
    3. PaLM-E
    4. Code as Policies
    5. RT-1
    6. RT-2
    7. RLHF
    8. Unity
    9. Isaac Sim

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers?
    pass
    AI named WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

WindyLab/LLM-RL-Papers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite