RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space

Default branch main · commit 806b36bb · scanned 6/8/2026, 10:02:53 PM

GitHub: 901 stars · 35 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening sentence to clarify the repo's primary function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    H1: The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook
    First sentence: This repository manually collects works in **latent space**, which will be continuously updated.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    H1: Awesome Latent Space: A Curated Collection of Papers and Resources
    First sentence: This repository is an awesome list manually collecting works in **latent space**, continuously updated, and includes our comprehensive survey: 'The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook'.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02029

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Generative Adversarial Networks: A Survey by Gui et al. (2020)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Generative Adversarial Networks: A Survey by Gui et al. (2020) · recommended 1×
  2. Variational Autoencoders and Generative Models: A Survey by Kingma and Welling (2019) · recommended 1×
  3. Disentangled Representation Learning: A Review by Bengio et al. (2019) · recommended 1×
  4. β-VAE · recommended 1×
  5. FactorVAE · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a comprehensive survey or overview of the current state of latent space research.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Generative Adversarial Networks: A Survey by Gui et al. (2020)
    2. Variational Autoencoders and Generative Models: A Survey by Kingma and Welling (2019)
    3. Disentangled Representation Learning: A Review by Bengio et al. (2019)
    4. β-VAE
    5. FactorVAE
    6. InfoGAN
    7. Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Review by Litjens et al. (2017)
    8. The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks by Frankle and Carbin (2019)
    9. Transformers: A Survey by Khan et al. (2022)
    10. Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applications by Zhou et al. (2020)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a curated collection of foundational and recent papers on latent space?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Papers With Code
    2. arXiv
    3. Google Scholar
    4. Distill.pub
    5. GitHub
    6. r/MachineLearning
    7. r/deeplearning
    8. NeurIPS
    9. ICML
    10. ICLR
    11. CVPR
    12. ICCV
    13. AAAI

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space?
    pass
    AI named YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

YU-deep/Awesome-Latent-Space — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite