RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

aallam/openai-kotlin

Default branch main · commit 9574ca39 · scanned 6/19/2026, 3:42:04 PM

GitHub: 1,835 stars · 235 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface aallam/openai-kotlin, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to clearly state its purpose and value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Kotlin client for OpenAI's API with multiplatform and coroutines capabilities.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An idiomatic, type-safe Kotlin client for seamlessly integrating with OpenAI's powerful generative AI models, including ChatGPT, DALL-E, and Whisper. Leverage multiplatform support and Kotlin Coroutines for robust, asynchronous interactions across all your Kotlin projects, ensuring a highly readable and concise experience.
  • highhomepage#2
    Add the homepage URL to the GitHub repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://mouaad.aallam.com/openai-kotlin/
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Key Features' section to the README to highlight core differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## ✨ Key Features
    
    - **Idiomatic Kotlin:** Designed with Kotlin-first principles for a natural and intuitive developer experience.
    - **Multiplatform Support:** Build once, deploy everywhere – JVM, Android, iOS, JS, and more.
    - **Coroutines & Flow:** Fully asynchronous API leveraging Kotlin Coroutines for non-blocking operations and Kotlin Flow for streaming responses.
    - **Type-Safe:** Strong typing ensures compile-time safety and reduces runtime errors.
    - **Comprehensive API Coverage:** Access to all major OpenAI models including ChatGPT, DALL-E, Whisper, and more.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface aallam/openai-kotlin
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Ktor Client
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Ktor Client · recommended 2×
  2. Google AI Kotlin SDK · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI Kotlin Client · recommended 1×
  4. LangChain4j · recommended 1×
  5. Hugging Face Inference API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What is the best library for accessing generative AI models from Kotlin applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google AI Kotlin SDK
    2. OpenAI Kotlin Client
    3. Ktor Client
    4. LangChain4j
    5. Hugging Face Inference API

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named aallam/openai-kotlin. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a multiplatform Kotlin client for interacting with advanced AI services asynchronously.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ktor Client
    2. OkHttp
    3. Retrofit
    4. Fuel
    5. HttpClient

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named aallam/openai-kotlin. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of aallam/openai-kotlin?
    pass
    AI did not name aallam/openai-kotlin — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts aallam/openai-kotlin in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named aallam/openai-kotlin explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo aallam/openai-kotlin solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named aallam/openai-kotlin explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of aallam/openai-kotlin. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/aallam/openai-kotlin.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/aallam/openai-kotlin)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/aallam/openai-kotlin"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/aallam/openai-kotlin.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

aallam/openai-kotlin — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite