RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

acheong08/ChatGPTProxy

Default branch main · commit 25dc1a68 · scanned 6/21/2026, 7:22:13 PM

GitHub: 1,329 stars · 325 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface acheong08/ChatGPTProxy, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clarify programmatic access and bypass capabilities

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # ChatGPT Proxy

Gets around cloudflare via TLS spoofing
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ChatGPT Proxy

Programmatically access the free ChatGPT web interface by bypassing Cloudflare and other network blocks via TLS spoofing. This tool enables developers to integrate ChatGPT into applications without an official OpenAI API key or browser automation.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/acheong08/ChatGPTProxy

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface acheong08/ChatGPTProxy
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Ollama
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Ollama · recommended 1×
  2. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  3. Jan · recommended 1×
  4. Hugging Face Transformers Library · recommended 1×
  5. ONNX Runtime · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to programmatically access an AI language model when encountering network blocks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ollama
    2. LM Studio
    3. Jan
    4. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    5. ONNX Runtime
    6. NVIDIA Jetson Series
    7. Google Coral Edge TPU
    8. Squid Proxy
    9. OpenVPN
    10. WireGuard

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named acheong08/ChatGPTProxy. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for bypassing web security measures to access premium AI services via API?
    you: not recommended
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of acheong08/ChatGPTProxy?
    pass
    AI did not name acheong08/ChatGPTProxy — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts acheong08/ChatGPTProxy in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named acheong08/ChatGPTProxy explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo acheong08/ChatGPTProxy solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named acheong08/ChatGPTProxy explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of acheong08/ChatGPTProxy. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/acheong08/ChatGPTProxy.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/acheong08/ChatGPTProxy)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/acheong08/ChatGPTProxy"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/acheong08/ChatGPTProxy.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

acheong08/ChatGPTProxy — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite