RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

afshinm/zerobox

Default branch main · commit 9a7affd6 · scanned 6/6/2026, 8:06:37 PM

GitHub: 639 stars · 39 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface afshinm/zerobox, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify core function and category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Lightweight, cross-platform process sandboxing powered by OpenAI Codex's sandbox runtime.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Zerobox provides lightweight, cross-platform process sandboxing, akin to `gVisor` or `Seccomp` but designed for application-level control, allowing you to sandbox any command with file, network, and credential controls.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://your-project-homepage.com
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to include broader security and isolation terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-agents, cli, llm, llm-sandbox, mcp, mcp-security, openclaw, process-isolation, rust, sandbox, security, security-tools, vault
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, cli, llm, llm-sandbox, mcp, mcp-security, openclaw, process-isolation, rust, sandbox, security, security-tools, vault, runtime-security, system-security, application-security, code-execution-environment

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface afshinm/zerobox
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AppArmor
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AppArmor · recommended 2×
  2. SELinux · recommended 2×
  3. google/gvisor · recommended 1×
  4. firecracker-microvm/firecracker · recommended 1×
  5. kata-containers/kata-containers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to securely execute untrusted code or commands with strict resource limitations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. gVisor (google/gvisor)
    2. Firecracker (firecracker-microvm/firecracker)
    3. Kata Containers (kata-containers/kata-containers)
    4. Docker (moby/moby)
    5. Seccomp
    6. AppArmor
    7. SELinux
    8. containerd (containerd/containerd)
    9. Podman (containers/podman)
    10. NSjail (google/nsjail)
    11. Jailkit (fabbione/jailkit)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named afshinm/zerobox. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a cross-platform solution to sandbox processes and manage sensitive credentials securely.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HashiCorp Vault
    2. Docker
    3. Podman
    4. Kubernetes
    5. OpenShift
    6. SELinux
    7. AppArmor
    8. Windows Defender Application Control
    9. AppLocker
    10. Google Cloud Secret Manager
    11. AWS Secrets Manager
    12. Azure Key Vault
    13. Open Policy Agent

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named afshinm/zerobox. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of afshinm/zerobox?
    pass
    AI did not name afshinm/zerobox — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts afshinm/zerobox in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named afshinm/zerobox explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo afshinm/zerobox solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named afshinm/zerobox explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of afshinm/zerobox. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/afshinm/zerobox.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/afshinm/zerobox)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/afshinm/zerobox"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/afshinm/zerobox.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

afshinm/zerobox — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite