RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt

Default branch main · commit 1fbf7a06 · scanned 5/15/2026, 12:12:33 PM

GitHub: 3,878 stars · 158 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify it's a standard/list, not an enforcement tool

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # ai.robots.txt

This list contains AI-related crawlers of all types, regardless of purpose. We encourage you to contribute to and implement this list on your own site.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ai.robots.txt: A Standardized List for Blocking AI Crawlers

This repository provides a community-maintained, standardized list of AI agents and robots, designed for use with `robots.txt` and various server configurations to communicate your preferences to AI crawlers. It provides the *what* to block, not the *how*.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, crawlers, crawling, privacy
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, robots-txt, bot-blocking, web-crawlers, data-privacy, content-protection, ai-agents, web-standards
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Update homepage URL to the main repository page

    Why:

    CURRENT
    https://github.com/ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt/releases.atom
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Cloudflare
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Cloudflare · recommended 2×
  2. AWS WAF · recommended 2×
  3. Apache · recommended 2×
  4. Nginx · recommended 2×
  5. Akamai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I prevent AI models and large language model crawlers from scraping my website?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cloudflare
    2. AWS WAF
    3. Akamai
    4. Apache
    5. Nginx
    6. Google reCAPTCHA
    7. hCaptcha

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best server-side configurations to block unwanted AI bots from crawling my site?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cloudflare
    2. Sucuri
    3. AWS WAF
    4. Apache
    5. Nginx
    6. mod_evasive
    7. mod_qos

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt?
    pass
    AI named ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite