RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

angular/web-codegen-scorer

Default branch main · commit af6d2c1f · scanned 6/16/2026, 4:53:41 AM

GitHub: 750 stars · 64 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface angular/web-codegen-scorer, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify LLM web code evaluation niche

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Web Codegen Scorer

**Web Codegen Scorer** is a tool for evaluating the quality of web code generated by Large Language Models (LLMs).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Web Codegen Scorer: Specialized Evaluation for LLM-Generated Web Code

**Web Codegen Scorer** is a specialized tool designed for objectively evaluating and comparing the quality of *web code specifically generated by Large Language Models (LLMs)*. Unlike generic linters or static analysis tools, it focuses on the unique challenges of AI-generated web code, providing evidence-based insights for prompt iteration, model comparison, and quality monitoring.
  • highhomepage#2
    Add repository URL as homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/angular/web-codegen-scorer
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand topics for better search relevance

    Why:

    CURRENT
    benchmarking, codegen, evaluation, llm-coding
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    benchmarking, codegen, evaluation, llm-coding, ai-code-quality, web-development, llm-evaluation, code-generation-quality, generative-ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface angular/web-codegen-scorer
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CodeQL
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CodeQL · recommended 2×
  2. SonarQube · recommended 2×
  3. ESLint · recommended 2×
  4. Pylint · recommended 2×
  5. StyleCop · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to benchmark the quality of AI-generated web application code effectively?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CodeQL
    2. SonarQube
    3. ESLint
    4. Pylint
    5. StyleCop
    6. PHP_CodeSniffer
    7. OWASP ZAP
    8. Playwright
    9. Cypress
    10. Selenium
    11. JMeter
    12. K6
    13. Locust

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named angular/web-codegen-scorer. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to compare code quality from various large language models for web development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CodeQL
    2. SonarQube
    3. ESLint
    4. Pylint
    5. StyleCop
    6. RuboCop
    7. OpenAI Evals
    8. Semgrep
    9. DeepSource

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named angular/web-codegen-scorer. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of angular/web-codegen-scorer?
    pass
    AI named angular/web-codegen-scorer explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts angular/web-codegen-scorer in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named angular/web-codegen-scorer explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo angular/web-codegen-scorer solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named angular/web-codegen-scorer explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of angular/web-codegen-scorer. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/angular/web-codegen-scorer.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/angular/web-codegen-scorer)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/angular/web-codegen-scorer"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/angular/web-codegen-scorer.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

angular/web-codegen-scorer — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite