RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

antoinezambelli/forge

Default branch main · commit fa3b9137 · scanned 5/29/2026, 11:31:59 PM

GitHub: 1,910 stars · 126 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface antoinezambelli/forge, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen the README's opening sentence to explicitly state its category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A reliability layer for self-hosted LLM tool-calling.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Forge is a Python framework providing a reliability layer for self-hosted LLM tool-calling and multi-step agentic workflows.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://pypi.org/project/forge-guardrails/ (or relevant project website)
  • lowtopics#3
    Add 'guardrails' to the repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agentic-ai, agentic-workflow, agents, function-calling, llama-cpp, llamafile, llm, ollama, python, self-hosted, tool-calling
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agentic-ai, agentic-workflow, agents, function-calling, guardrails, llama-cpp, llamafile, llm, ollama, python, self-hosted, tool-calling

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface antoinezambelli/forge
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI Python Library · recommended 1×
  4. Instructor · recommended 1×
  5. Pydantic · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I improve reliability for self-hosted LLM tool-calling in Python applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI Python Library
    4. Instructor
    5. Pydantic
    6. Hugging Face `transformers`

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named antoinezambelli/forge. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What Python framework helps build robust agentic workflows with local LLMs and guardrails?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. Guardrails AI
    5. Marvin
    6. CrewAI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named antoinezambelli/forge. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of antoinezambelli/forge?
    pass
    AI named antoinezambelli/forge explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts antoinezambelli/forge in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named antoinezambelli/forge explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo antoinezambelli/forge solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named antoinezambelli/forge explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of antoinezambelli/forge. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/antoinezambelli/forge.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/antoinezambelli/forge)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/antoinezambelli/forge"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/antoinezambelli/forge.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

antoinezambelli/forge — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite