RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups

Default branch main · commit 3c7f082b · scanned 6/15/2026, 12:01:38 AM

GitHub: 753 stars · 124 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add descriptive topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome-list, semiconductor, startups, database, curated-list, market-intelligence, hardware, deep-tech, venture-capital
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT or Apache-2.0) and add it to the repository root. If the data itself has a specific license, clarify that in the README.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Crunchbase
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Crunchbase · recommended 2×
  2. CB Insights · recommended 2×
  3. TechCrunch · recommended 2×
  4. Andreessen Horowitz · recommended 2×
  5. Sequoia Capital · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive list of emerging companies in the semiconductor industry?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PitchBook
    2. Crunchbase
    3. CB Insights
    4. TechCrunch
    5. Axios Pro
    6. The Information
    7. Gartner
    8. IDC
    9. Yole Développement
    10. Andreessen Horowitz
    11. Sequoia Capital
    12. Intel Capital
    13. SK Hynix Ventures
    14. SEMI
    15. ISS
    16. Hot Chips

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What resources exist to track innovative new startups focused on semiconductor technology?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TechCrunch
    2. Crunchbase
    3. CB Insights
    4. Semiconductor Engineering
    5. EE Times
    6. LinkedIn
    7. Sequoia Capital
    8. Andreessen Horowitz
    9. Intel Capital
    10. SK Hynix Ventures
    11. Samsung Catalyst Fund

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups?
    pass
    AI did not name aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

aolofsson/awesome-semiconductor-startups — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite