RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers

Default branch main · commit 280218b4 · scanned 5/8/2026, 2:07:56 PM

GitHub: 5,525 stars · 1,399 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify 'MCP' in the README title and opening paragraph

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Awesome MCP Servers
    
    A curated list of awesome Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. MCP is an open protocol...
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Awesome Model Context Protocol (MCP) Servers
    
    A curated list of awesome Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. This list focuses on production-ready and experimental servers that enable AI models to securely interact with local and remote resources through standardized server implementations.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL (e.g., a project website, documentation, or a dedicated landing page for MCP) to the 'Website' field in the repository settings.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
moby/moby
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. moby/moby · recommended 1×
  2. containers/podman · recommended 1×
  3. google/gvisor · recommended 1×
  4. SELinux · recommended 1×
  5. AppArmor · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I enable my AI agent to securely interact with local system resources?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Docker (moby/moby)
    2. Podman (containers/podman)
    3. gVisor (google/gvisor)
    4. SELinux
    5. AppArmor
    6. Firejail (netblue30/firejail)
    7. Open Policy Agent (open-policy-agent/opa)
    8. HashiCorp Vault (hashicorp/vault)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks exist for giving large language models access to external tools and APIs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    4. Haystack
    5. OpenAI Functions/Tools
    6. Agentic

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers?
    pass
    AI did not name appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

appcypher/awesome-mcp-servers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite