RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram

Default branch main · commit 56d23371 · scanned 6/23/2026, 12:37:48 PM

GitHub: 1,366 stars · 68 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README's opening to emphasize Android client and tech stack

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Cherrygram is a third-party Telegram client with not many but useful modifications. This is an unofficial fork of the original Telegram App for Android. This repo contains the official source code for Telegram App for Android.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Cherrygram is an open-source, third-party Telegram client for Android, built with Java and Kotlin. It's an unofficial fork of the original Telegram App for Android, offering useful modifications and enhancements.
  • highabout#2
    Add a concise description to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An open-source, third-party Telegram client for Android, built with Java and Kotlin, offering useful modifications and enhancements.
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison

Cherrygram stands out from other third-party Telegram clients like Nekogram X, Plus Messenger, and Graph Messenger by offering [specific unique features or philosophy, e.g., a focus on privacy, specific UI/UX choices, or a particular set of modifications]. While sharing a common base as an unofficial Telegram App for Android fork, Cherrygram aims to provide [briefly state core value proposition, e.g., a streamlined experience, advanced customization for power users, or specific security enhancements].

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Nekogram X
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Nekogram X · recommended 2×
  2. Plus Messenger · recommended 2×
  3. Graph Messenger · recommended 2×
  4. Telegram FOSS · recommended 1×
  5. Bgram · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some open source Android clients offering extra Telegram features?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Nekogram X
    2. Plus Messenger
    3. Telegram FOSS
    4. Graph Messenger
    5. Bgram

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a customizable Java/Kotlin Android messaging app based on Telegram API.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Telegram-FOSS
    2. Nekogram X
    3. Plus Messenger
    4. Graph Messenger
    5. BGram

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram?
    pass
    AI named arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

arsLan4k1390/Cherrygram — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite