REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

async-labs/builderbook

Default branch master · commit a71c72e2 · scanned 6/20/2026, 2:28:08 PM

GitHub: 3,800 stars · 896 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

40 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

3 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface async-labs/builderbook, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highabout#1

Clarify the repository description to emphasize its core purpose

Why:

CURRENT

Open source web application to learn JS stack: React, Material-UI, Next.js, Node.js, Express.js, Mongoose, MongoDB database.

COPY-PASTE FIX

Open source web application boilerplate for learning modern JS stack by building and selling digital content like books or courses.

mediumtopics#2

Add specific topics related to digital content and boilerplate type

Why:

CURRENT

apis, aws-ses, boilerplate, express-session, expressjs, github-api, google-api, javascript, mailchimp, material-ui, mongodb, mongoose, nextjs, nodejs, passport, react, stripe

COPY-PASTE FIX

aws-ses, boilerplate, content-monetization, digital-publishing, ebooks, expressjs, fullstack-javascript, javascript, mailchimp, material-ui, mongodb, mongoose, nextjs, nodejs, online-courses, passport, react, saas-boilerplate, stripe, web-app-boilerplate

lowreadme#3

Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add a new section to the README, perhaps titled 'Why Builder Book?' or 'Comparison,' that explicitly contrasts Builder Book with generic full-stack JavaScript boilerplates or general e-commerce platforms, highlighting its unique focus on building and selling digital content like books and courses.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface async-labs/builderbook

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

Create React App

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

Create React App · recommended 1×
Node.js · recommended 1×
Express · recommended 1×
Next.js · recommended 1×
MongoDB · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
Looking for a full-stack JavaScript boilerplate project to learn modern web development.
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Create React App
2. Node.js
3. Express
4. Next.js
5. MongoDB
6. React
7. MERN Starter (Hashnode/mern-starter)
8. T3 Stack
9. TypeScript
10. tRPC
11. Tailwind CSS
12. Prisma
13. Angular
14. MEAN.JS (meanjs/mean)
15. Blitz.js
AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named async-labs/builderbook. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Need an open-source web application starter kit for selling digital content online.
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Next.js Commerce (vercel/commerce)
2. Medusa.js (medusajs/medusa)
3. Saleor (saleor/saleor)
4. Reaction Commerce (reactioncommerce/reaction)
5. Shuup (shuup/shuup)
AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named async-labs/builderbook. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of async-labs/builderbook?
pass
AI named async-labs/builderbook explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts async-labs/builderbook in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named async-labs/builderbook explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo async-labs/builderbook solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named async-labs/builderbook explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of async-labs/builderbook. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/async-labs/builderbook.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/async-labs/builderbook)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/async-labs/builderbook"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/async-labs/builderbook.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

async-labs/builderbook — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite