RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

aymenfurter/microagents

Default branch main · commit 5d52c807 · scanned 6/11/2026, 4:31:50 AM

GitHub: 813 stars · 33 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface aymenfurter/microagents, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening description to specify LLM agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An experimental framework for dynamically creating self-improving agents in response to tasks.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An experimental Python framework for dynamically creating self-improving **LLM agents** that can edit their own prompts and code in response to tasks.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    gpt-4-turbo, llm, openai
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm-agents, self-improving-ai, prompt-engineering, code-generation, python-framework, gpt-4-turbo, openai
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/aymenfurter/microagents

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface aymenfurter/microagents
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Ray RLLib
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Ray RLLib · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI Gym · recommended 1×
  3. Gymnasium · recommended 1×
  4. Stable Baselines3 · recommended 1×
  5. Acme · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build AI agents that dynamically adapt and improve their own behavior?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ray RLLib
    2. OpenAI Gym
    3. Gymnasium
    4. Stable Baselines3
    5. Acme
    6. PyTorch
    7. PyTorch-Lightning
    8. Catalyst
    9. TensorFlow
    10. Keras
    11. TF-Agents
    12. DEAP

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named aymenfurter/microagents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What Python framework helps create self-improving LLM agents for persistent task learning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    3. Haystack (deepset-ai/haystack)
    4. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    5. CrewAI (joaomdmoura/crewAI)
    6. Transformers Agents (huggingface/transformers)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named aymenfurter/microagents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of aymenfurter/microagents?
    pass
    AI named aymenfurter/microagents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts aymenfurter/microagents in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named aymenfurter/microagents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo aymenfurter/microagents solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named aymenfurter/microagents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of aymenfurter/microagents. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/aymenfurter/microagents.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/aymenfurter/microagents)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/aymenfurter/microagents"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/aymenfurter/microagents.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

aymenfurter/microagents — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite