RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

aymericzip/intlayer

Default branch main · commit 15240432 · scanned 6/8/2026, 5:11:57 AM

GitHub: 761 stars · 119 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface aymericzip/intlayer, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise value proposition paragraph to the README's introduction

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README starts with badges/links, then H1 'Per-component i18n', H2 'AI-powered translation. Visual Editor. Multilingual CMS.', then 'What is Intlayer?'.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Insert the following paragraph directly after the H2 and before the 'What is Intlayer?' section: "Intlayer is a comprehensive, type-safe internationalization (i18n) solution for modern JavaScript applications, specifically designed for React, Next.js, and Vite projects. It uniquely combines AI-powered translation, a visual editor, and a multilingual CMS to offer per-component localization, eliminating common i18n complexities and runtime errors."
  • mediumabout#2
    Enhance the repository's 'About' description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Per-component Internationalisation solution for JS application. Type-Safe. Translate with AI. Edit Visually.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Per-component Internationalisation solution for React, Next.js, and Vite JS applications. Type-Safe, AI-powered translation, and Visual Editor for seamless multilingual content management.
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a dedicated comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, titled 'Why Intlayer? (vs. other i18n libraries)' or 'Comparison with Alternatives,' detailing how Intlayer's type-safety, AI integration, visual editor, and per-component approach differentiate it from i18next, next-intl, formatjs, etc.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface aymericzip/intlayer
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
formatjs/formatjs
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. formatjs/formatjs · recommended 2×
  2. Storyblok · recommended 1×
  3. DeepL Pro · recommended 1×
  4. Google Cloud Translation · recommended 1×
  5. Sanity.io · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to implement AI-powered multilingual content for React applications with a visual editor?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Storyblok
    2. DeepL Pro
    3. Google Cloud Translation
    4. Sanity.io
    5. OpenAI GPT-4
    6. Contentful
    7. Smartling
    8. Lokalise

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named aymericzip/intlayer. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a type-safe component-level internationalization library for Next.js or Vite projects.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. next-intl (amannn/next-intl)
    2. i18next (i18next/i18next)
    3. react-i18next (i18next/react-i18next)
    4. i18next-resources-to-backend (i18next/i18next-resources-to-backend)
    5. formatjs (formatjs/formatjs)
    6. react-intl (formatjs/formatjs)
    7. lingui (lingui/js-lingui)
    8. typesafe-i18n (ivanhofer/typesafe-i18n)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named aymericzip/intlayer. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of aymericzip/intlayer?
    pass
    AI did not name aymericzip/intlayer — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts aymericzip/intlayer in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named aymericzip/intlayer explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo aymericzip/intlayer solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named aymericzip/intlayer explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of aymericzip/intlayer. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/aymericzip/intlayer.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/aymericzip/intlayer)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/aymericzip/intlayer"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/aymericzip/intlayer.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

aymericzip/intlayer — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite