REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies
Default branch master · commit e25ac385 · scanned 6/3/2026, 5:07:29 AM
GitHub: 645 stars · 46 forks
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highabout#1Expand the 'About' section description
Why:
CURRENTAwesome Lisp Companies
COPY-PASTE FIXA curated list of companies that actively use Common Lisp or Scheme in their technology stack, ideal for developers seeking Lisp-centric employment or collaboration opportunities.
- highlicense#2Add a LICENSE file to the repository
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXAdd a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT License) to the repository root to clearly state the terms of use.
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- Allegro CL · recommended 2×
- CodeSurfer · recommended 1×
- Remote Agent · recommended 1×
- Corman Lisp · recommended 1×
- Grammarly · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhich companies actively use Common Lisp or Scheme in their technology stack?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- CodeSurfer
- Remote Agent
- Allegro CL
- Corman Lisp
AI recommended 4 alternatives but never named azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYWhere can I find a list of successful companies leveraging Lisp for their products?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Grammarly
- ITA Software
- Google Flights
- Game Oriented Assembly Lisp (GOAL)
- Allegro CL
- AllegroGraph
- Kyoto Common Lisp (KCL)
- GNU Common Lisp (GCL)
AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies?passAI did not name azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI did not name azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite