RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

badlogic/sitegeist

Default branch main · commit 104788c6 · scanned 6/4/2026, 9:47:13 PM

GitHub: 635 stars · 105 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface badlogic/sitegeist, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reinforce current purpose and active status in README opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An AI assistant that lives in your browser sidebar. Built for collaboration, not autonomy theater. You guide, it executes.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Sitegeist is an actively maintained AI assistant that lives in your browser sidebar. Built for collaboration, not autonomy theater, you guide it to automate web tasks, extract data, and transform information.
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a brief comparison to programmatic web automation tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Sitegeist vs. Programmatic Automation Tools

Unlike libraries such as Puppeteer, Selenium, or Playwright, Sitegeist is a user-guided AI assistant that operates directly within your browser as an extension. It's designed for collaboration and direct interaction, not for writing code to control a browser programmatically.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface badlogic/sitegeist
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
puppeteer/puppeteer
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. puppeteer/puppeteer · recommended 2×
  2. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 2×
  3. microsoft/playwright · recommended 2×
  4. crummy/BeautifulSoup · recommended 2×
  5. psf/requests · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate repetitive web tasks and extract data directly from my browser?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    2. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    3. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    4. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup)
    5. Requests (psf/requests)
    6. UI.Vision RPA (ui-vision/rpa)
    7. Data Scraper
    8. Scrapy (scrapy/scrapy)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named badlogic/sitegeist. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI assistant to guide for web automation and data transformation in the browser.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    2. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    3. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    4. Cypress (cypress-io/cypress)
    5. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup)
    6. Requests (psf/requests)
    7. Cheerio (cheeriojs/cheerio)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named badlogic/sitegeist. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of badlogic/sitegeist?
    pass
    AI named badlogic/sitegeist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts badlogic/sitegeist in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named badlogic/sitegeist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo badlogic/sitegeist solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named badlogic/sitegeist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of badlogic/sitegeist. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/badlogic/sitegeist.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/badlogic/sitegeist)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/badlogic/sitegeist"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/badlogic/sitegeist.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

badlogic/sitegeist — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite