RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bkdevs/async-server

Default branch main · commit d743728b · scanned 6/4/2026, 3:37:32 PM

GitHub: 541 stars · 47 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bkdevs/async-server, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-coding, task-management, code-review, developer-tools, github-integrations, claude-ai, workflow-automation
  • mediumabout#2
    Refine the 'About' description for clarity as a platform

    Why:

    CURRENT
    It's like Claude Code + Linear + GitHub PR
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An AI-powered developer platform for end-to-end software development, combining AI coding, task management, and code review into one workflow.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., '## Comparison to Alternatives' or '## How Async Differs', explaining its unique integrated workflow compared to standalone AI coding tools or traditional issue trackers, and explicitly stating it is not a generic `asyncio` server library.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bkdevs/async-server
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  2. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions · recommended 1×
  3. AWS CodeWhisperer · recommended 1×
  4. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  5. GitLab Duo Chat · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to use AI for end-to-end software development workflow from issue to merged PR?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions
    3. AWS CodeWhisperer
    4. GitHub Copilot Chat
    5. GitLab Duo Chat
    6. Cursor
    7. CodiumAI
    8. Tabnine
    9. DeepSource
    10. SonarQube
    11. GitHub Copilot for Pull Requests
    12. GitLab Duo Code Review
    13. Linear
    14. Jira
    15. OpenAI API
    16. Azure OpenAI Service

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named bkdevs/async-server. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Integrated platform combining AI coding, issue tracking, and code review capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise
    2. GitHub Issues
    3. GitHub Pull Requests
    4. Jira Software
    5. GitHub
    6. Copilot Business
    7. Bitbucket
    8. Atlassian Intelligence
    9. GitLab
    10. GitLab Duo
    11. GitLab Ultimate
    12. Azure DevOps
    13. Azure Boards
    14. Azure Repos
    15. JetBrains Space
    16. AI Assistant

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named bkdevs/async-server. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bkdevs/async-server?
    pass
    AI named bkdevs/async-server explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bkdevs/async-server in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bkdevs/async-server explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bkdevs/async-server solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named bkdevs/async-server explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bkdevs/async-server. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bkdevs/async-server.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bkdevs/async-server)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bkdevs/async-server"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bkdevs/async-server.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bkdevs/async-server — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite