RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

blader/napkin

Default branch main · commit 27fa60a8 · scanned 6/11/2026, 8:53:08 PM

GitHub: 549 stars · 38 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface blader/napkin, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to clearly state it's an AI agent skill

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Napkin

A skill for Claude Code that gives the agent persistent memory of its mistakes.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Napkin: Persistent Memory Skill for Claude Code AI Agents

Napkin is a specialized skill for Claude Code that gives your AI agent persistent, project-specific memory of its mistakes and learnings.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, claude-code, persistent-memory, continual-learning, ai-skill, llm-tools, developer-tools
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/blader/napkin

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface blader/napkin
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. Pinecone · recommended 2×
  3. Weaviate · recommended 2×
  4. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  5. ChromaDB · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I give my AI coding assistant persistent memory to learn from past mistakes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. Pinecone
    3. Weaviate
    4. ChromaDB
    5. LlamaIndex
    6. PostgreSQL
    7. pgvector
    8. MongoDB
    9. MongoDB Atlas Vector Search
    10. Redis
    11. Redis Stack
    12. RediSearch
    13. Faiss
    14. Annoy

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named blader/napkin. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help an AI development agent continually learn and retain project-specific knowledge?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Pinecone
    4. Weaviate
    5. Neo4j
    6. Confluence
    7. Jira
    8. GitHub
    9. GitLab

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named blader/napkin. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of blader/napkin?
    pass
    AI named blader/napkin explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts blader/napkin in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named blader/napkin explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo blader/napkin solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named blader/napkin explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of blader/napkin. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/blader/napkin.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/blader/napkin)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/blader/napkin"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/blader/napkin.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

blader/napkin — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite