RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bohanli/BERT-flow

Default branch main · commit 7fa8f6d4 · scanned 5/30/2026, 7:18:22 PM

GitHub: 535 stars · 68 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bohanli/BERT-flow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state the repo's purpose and value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # On the Sentence Embeddings from Pre-trained Language Models
    
    <p align="center">
    
    </p>
    
    This is a TensorFlow implementation of the following paper:
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # BERT-flow: TensorFlow for Superior Sentence Embeddings
    
    This repository offers a TensorFlow implementation of the EMNLP 2020 paper 'On the Sentence Embeddings from Pre-trained Language Models'. BERT-flow leverages normalizing flows to generate more accurate and robust sentence embeddings from pre-trained BERT models, providing advanced textual sentence representations for NLP tasks.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the paper's URL as the repository homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.05864

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bohanli/BERT-flow
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Sentence-BERT (SBERT)
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Sentence-BERT (SBERT) · recommended 2×
  2. SimCSE · recommended 1×
  3. RoBERTa-large · recommended 1×
  4. XLM-RoBERTa-large · recommended 1×
  5. DeBERTa-v3-large · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to generate more accurate and robust sentence embeddings from pre-trained models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Sentence-BERT (SBERT)
    2. SimCSE
    3. RoBERTa-large
    4. XLM-RoBERTa-large
    5. DeBERTa-v3-large
    6. BioBERT
    7. SciBERT
    8. all-MiniLM-L6-v2
    9. all-mpnet-base-v2

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named bohanli/BERT-flow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What advanced TensorFlow techniques exist for creating superior textual sentence representations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Universal Sentence Encoder (USE)
    2. BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers)
    3. RoBERTa
    4. ALBERT
    5. DistilBERT
    6. transformers
    7. Sentence-BERT (SBERT)
    8. ELECTRA (Efficiently Learning an Encoder that Classifies Token Replacements Accurately)
    9. XLNet
    10. T5 (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named bohanli/BERT-flow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bohanli/BERT-flow?
    pass
    AI named bohanli/BERT-flow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bohanli/BERT-flow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bohanli/BERT-flow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bohanli/BERT-flow solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name bohanli/BERT-flow — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bohanli/BERT-flow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bohanli/BERT-flow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bohanli/BERT-flow)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bohanli/BERT-flow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bohanli/BERT-flow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bohanli/BERT-flow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite