REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio

Default branch main · commit f612b1cb · scanned 7/6/2026, 3:50:05 AM

GitHub: 5,307 stars · 566 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

40 /100

Critical

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

0 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

CATEGORY VISIBILITY UNAVAILABLE

The category visibility step did not produce results for this scan (the LLM may have been unreachable). Re-run the diagnosis to get the full GEO picture.

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio?
skipped
AI did not name breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
skipped
AI did not name breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio solve, and who is the primary audience?
skipped
AI did not name breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite