RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0

Default branch main · commit dd366c84 · scanned 6/4/2026, 8:52:43 PM

GitHub: 633 stars · 60 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a sentence to the README clarifying the repo's value for AI video research

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository serves as a community-compiled knowledge base for researchers and enthusiasts tracking the development and technical details of the Happy Horse 1.0 AI video generator.
  • mediumlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file or clarify licensing in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a clear statement to the README, for example: 'All information compiled in this repository is shared under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Sora
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Sora · recommended 1×
  2. Google Lumiere · recommended 1×
  3. RunwayML Gen-2 · recommended 1×
  4. Pika Labs · recommended 1×
  5. Meta Make-A-Video · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best AI models for generating realistic video content from text descriptions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Sora
    2. Google Lumiere
    3. RunwayML Gen-2
    4. Pika Labs
    5. Meta Make-A-Video

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking comprehensive AI solutions for video creation and editing; what are the current options?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RunwayML
    2. Descript
    3. Synthesys AI Studio
    4. HeyGen
    5. Pictory AI
    6. Adobe Premiere Pro
    7. CapCut

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0?
    pass
    AI named brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

brooks376/Happy-Horse-1.0 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite