RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

browser-use/agent-sdk

Default branch main · commit 0cf7492f · scanned 6/7/2026, 4:17:49 AM

GitHub: 685 stars · 45 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface browser-use/agent-sdk, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise repository description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A minimal Python SDK for building AI agents that interact with and control web browsers, focusing on tool calls and task completion.
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening to highlight browser automation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # bu-agent-sdk

_An agent is just a for-loop._

The simplest possible agent framework. No abstractions. No magic. Just a for-loop of tool calls. The framework powering BU.app.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # bu-agent-sdk: A Minimal Python SDK for Browser-Enabled AI Agents

_An agent is just a for-loop, especially when interacting with browsers._

The simplest possible agent framework for browser automation. No abstractions. No magic. Just a for-loop of tool calls, designed to empower AI agents to interact with web browsers. The framework powering BU.app.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface browser-use/agent-sdk
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CrewAI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  2. Guidance · recommended 2×
  3. LangChain Express · recommended 1×
  4. LiteLLM · recommended 1×
  5. Transformers Agents · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What is a straightforward Python library for building AI agents with minimal overhead?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain Express
    2. CrewAI
    3. LiteLLM
    4. Guidance
    5. Transformers Agents
    6. openai Python client library
    7. anthropic Python client library

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named browser-use/agent-sdk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to create a Python LLM agent that effectively calls tools and manages task completion?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. CrewAI
    4. AutoGen
    5. Haystack
    6. OpenAI Functions
    7. Guidance

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named browser-use/agent-sdk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of browser-use/agent-sdk?
    pass
    AI named browser-use/agent-sdk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts browser-use/agent-sdk in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named browser-use/agent-sdk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo browser-use/agent-sdk solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named browser-use/agent-sdk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of browser-use/agent-sdk. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/browser-use/agent-sdk.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/browser-use/agent-sdk)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/browser-use/agent-sdk"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/browser-use/agent-sdk.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

browser-use/agent-sdk — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite