REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

browser-use/workflow-use

Default branch main · commit 18d46133 · scanned 6/23/2026, 7:37:05 AM

GitHub: 4,054 stars · 330 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

40 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

3 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface browser-use/workflow-use, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition README's introductory paragraph to clarify core offering

Why:

CURRENT

⚙️ **Workflow Use** is the easiest way to create and execute deterministic workflows with variables which fallback to Browser Use if a step fails. You just _show_ the recorder the workflow, we automatically generate the workflow.

COPY-PASTE FIX

⚙️ **Workflow Use** is an RPA 2.0 platform for creating and executing deterministic, self-healing browser automation workflows. Unlike generic browser automation libraries or test frameworks, Workflow Use allows you to _show_ the recorder your task, then automatically generates a robust workflow that can adapt to changes and recover from failures.

hightopics#2

Add more specific topics for key features

Why:

CURRENT

browser-automation, browser-use-box, rpa, telegram-automation

COPY-PASTE FIX

browser-automation, browser-use-box, rpa, telegram-automation, self-healing, workflow-automation, low-code, no-code, natural-language-processing, generative-ai

mediumreadme#3

Clarify project scope regarding 'GitHub Actions'

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add a new section or clear statement in the README, such as: '### What Workflow Use is NOT: Workflow Use is a standalone RPA 2.0 platform designed for robust browser automation, not a GitHub Action or a simple wrapper for browser testing libraries like Playwright or Cypress.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface browser-use/workflow-use

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

Robot Framework

Recommended in 2 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

Robot Framework · recommended 2×
Playwright · recommended 1×
Cypress · recommended 1×
FluentLenium · recommended 1×
Selenide · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How to build resilient browser automation workflows that self-heal on failures?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Playwright
2. Cypress
3. FluentLenium
4. Selenide
5. Puppeteer
6. Robot Framework
7. SeleniumLibrary
8. TestCafe
AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named browser-use/workflow-use. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Tool to generate browser automation scripts from natural language descriptions easily?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Playwright Test Generator
2. Selenium IDE
3. Robot Framework
4. Testim
5. Cypress Studio
6. Applitools Ultrafast Test Cloud
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named browser-use/workflow-use. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of browser-use/workflow-use?
pass
AI named browser-use/workflow-use explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts browser-use/workflow-use in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named browser-use/workflow-use explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo browser-use/workflow-use solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named browser-use/workflow-use explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of browser-use/workflow-use. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/browser-use/workflow-use.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/browser-use/workflow-use)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/browser-use/workflow-use"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/browser-use/workflow-use.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

browser-use/workflow-use — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite