RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

browserbase/skills

Default branch main · commit 13a7f4af · scanned 5/8/2026, 3:43:04 AM

GitHub: 2,600 stars · 164 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface browserbase/skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, llm-tools, browser-automation, web-browsing, claude-sdk, browserbase, playwright
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen README's opening to emphasize AI agent tooling

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Browserbase Skills
    
    A set of skills for enabling **Claude Code** to work with Browserbase through browser automation and the official `bb` CLI.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Browserbase Skills: Web Browsing & Automation for AI Agents
    
    A set of powerful, Playwright-backed skills enabling **Claude Code** and other AI agents to browse the web, interact with websites, and automate complex tasks through Browserbase.
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    (Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, e.g., MIT or Apache-2.0, to clearly state the project's licensing terms.)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface browserbase/skills
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
microsoft/playwright
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. microsoft/playwright · recommended 2×
  2. puppeteer/puppeteer · recommended 2×
  3. berstend/puppeteer-extra · recommended 2×
  4. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 1×
  5. crummy/BeautifulSoup · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I enable my AI agent to browse the web and interact with websites?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    3. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    4. Beautiful Soup (crummy/BeautifulSoup)
    5. requests (psf/requests)
    6. httpx (encode/httpx)
    7. Scrapy (scrapy/scrapy)
    8. Splash (scrapinghub/splash)
    9. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named browserbase/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help debug browser automation failures caused by bot detection or CAPTCHAs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    2. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    3. Chrome DevTools
    4. Firefox Developer Tools
    5. Bright Data
    6. Oxylabs
    7. Smartproxy
    8. AmIUnique
    9. FingerprintJS Demo (fingerprintjs/fingerprintjs)
    10. puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth (berstend/puppeteer-extra)
    11. playwright-extra-plugin-stealth (berstend/puppeteer-extra)
    12. Fiddler
    13. Charles Proxy
    14. mitmproxy (mitmproxy/mitmproxy)

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named browserbase/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of browserbase/skills?
    pass
    AI named browserbase/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts browserbase/skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named browserbase/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo browserbase/skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named browserbase/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of browserbase/skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/browserbase/skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/browserbase/skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/browserbase/skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/browserbase/skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

browserbase/skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite