REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Default branch main · commit 8d734a80 · scanned 6/28/2026, 4:32:48 PM

GitHub: 517 stars · 73 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

20 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

0 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1
Reposition the README H1 to clarify AI agent focus and academic publishing context
Why:
CURRENT
```
# Awesome Journal Skills (AJS)
```
COPY-PASTE FIX
```
# Awesome Journal Skills (AJS): AI Agent Skill Packs for Academic Publishing
```

mediumabout#2

Emphasize 'AI agent skill packs' at the beginning of the repository description

Why:

CURRENT

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。

COPY-PASTE FIX

AI Agent Skill Packs for Academic Publishing: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skills covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。

lowcomparison#3

Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

## Comparison with Alternatives

Unlike general-purpose AI writing assistants (e.g., ChatGPT, QuillBot, Grammarly) or broad research tools (e.g., Elicit, Scite.ai), Awesome Journal Skills provides *pre-packaged, journal-specific skill sets* for AI agents like Claude Code/Codex. We focus on the entire academic publishing workflow, offering structured prompts and strategies tailored to specific journal requirements and peer review processes, rather than just general text generation or literature review.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

ChatGPT

Recommended in 2 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

ChatGPT · recommended 2×
QuillBot · recommended 2×
Elicit · recommended 2×
Scite.ai · recommended 2×
GPT-4 · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How can AI agents assist with academic research writing and journal submission processes?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. ChatGPT
2. GPT-4
3. QuillBot
4. Grammarly
5. Elicit
6. Scite.ai
7. ResearchRabbit
8. Overleaf
AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
What LLM tools help streamline scholarly publishing, from drafting to peer review responses?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. ChatGPT
2. Elicit
3. QuillBot
4. Grammarly (Premium)
5. Scite.ai
6. Consensus
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills?
pass
AI did not name brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI did not name brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI did not name brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite