RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

buaacyw/MeshAnything

Default branch main · commit 7a3cd736 · scanned 6/21/2026, 4:07:56 PM

GitHub: 2,287 stars · 106 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface buaacyw/MeshAnything, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • mediumtopics#1
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    3d, auto-regressive-model, generative-ai, generative-model, iclr2025, large-language-models, mesh, mesh-generation, point-cloud, transformers
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    3d, auto-regressive-model, generative-ai, generative-model, iclr2025, large-language-models, mesh, mesh-generation, point-cloud, transformers, text-to-mesh, image-to-mesh, multi-view-to-mesh, unified-3d-generation, artist-quality-3d
  • lowlicense#2
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section or line in the README, for example: "This project is released under the terms specified in the `LICENSE` file. Please refer to the `LICENSE` file for full details."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface buaacyw/MeshAnything
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
DreamFusion
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. DreamFusion · recommended 2×
  2. Magic3D · recommended 2×
  3. GET3D · recommended 2×
  4. Point-E · recommended 2×
  5. Luma AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I generate high-quality 3D meshes from diverse inputs using generative AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DreamFusion
    2. Magic3D
    3. GET3D
    4. Point-E
    5. Luma AI
    6. Spline
    7. Shap-E
    8. Meshy.ai

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named buaacyw/MeshAnything. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best autoregressive transformer models for artist-quality 3D mesh creation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GET3D
    2. Point-E
    3. DreamFusion
    4. Magic3D
    5. MeshGPT

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named buaacyw/MeshAnything. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of buaacyw/MeshAnything?
    pass
    AI named buaacyw/MeshAnything explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts buaacyw/MeshAnything in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named buaacyw/MeshAnything explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo buaacyw/MeshAnything solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name buaacyw/MeshAnything — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of buaacyw/MeshAnything. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/buaacyw/MeshAnything.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/buaacyw/MeshAnything)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/buaacyw/MeshAnything"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/buaacyw/MeshAnything.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

buaacyw/MeshAnything — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite