RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bytedance/Lance

Default branch main · commit 2d93aee3 · scanned 6/1/2026, 2:32:19 PM

GitHub: 1,082 stars · 75 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bytedance/Lance, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify project identity in README to distinguish from vector database

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a prominent sentence near the top of the README, such as: "Note: This `bytedance/Lance` repository presents a 3B-active-parameter unified multimodal *model* for image and video understanding, generation, and editing, and is distinct from the Lance data format or lancedb vector database."
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Key Capabilities' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section titled 'Key Capabilities' or 'What Lance Offers' with bullet points detailing its specific strengths in image/video understanding, generation, and editing, e.g., 'Unified understanding across image and video modalities,' 'High-quality content generation from diverse inputs,' 'Advanced editing functionalities for visual media.'
  • lowcomparison#3
    Create a 'Comparison' section to differentiate from commercial solutions

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, perhaps titled 'Lance vs. Commercial Solutions' or 'Why Choose Lance?', that briefly outlines its advantages as an open-source, unified multimodal *model* compared to large commercial AI services or general creative platforms.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bytedance/Lance
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Gemini
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Gemini · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI GPT-4o · recommended 1×
  3. Meta AI · recommended 1×
  4. Google Imagen · recommended 1×
  5. Lumiere · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI models can perform unified image and video generation, understanding, and editing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Gemini
    2. OpenAI GPT-4o
    3. Meta AI
    4. Google Imagen
    5. Lumiere
    6. Stability AI Stable Diffusion (Stability-AI/stablediffusion)
    7. ControlNet (lllyasviel/ControlNet)
    8. AnimateDiff (guoyww/AnimateDiff)
    9. RunwayML Gen-2

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named bytedance/Lance. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a comprehensive multimodal solution for advanced image and video content creation and analysis.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Adobe Creative Cloud
    2. Blackmagic DaVinci Resolve Studio
    3. NVIDIA Omniverse
    4. Google Cloud AI Platform
    5. AWS Rekognition
    6. OpenCV

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named bytedance/Lance. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bytedance/Lance?
    pass
    AI named bytedance/Lance explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bytedance/Lance in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bytedance/Lance explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bytedance/Lance solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named bytedance/Lance explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bytedance/Lance. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bytedance/Lance.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bytedance/Lance)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bytedance/Lance"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bytedance/Lance.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bytedance/Lance — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite