RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

caezium/Burrow

Default branch main · commit b6ba1970 · scanned 6/17/2026, 4:21:47 AM

GitHub: 695 stars · 137 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface caezium/Burrow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to explicitly state its software category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    🐹 A free, open-source, native macOS GUI for the Mole CLI (mo): clean, uninstall, optimize, analyze disk, and watch live status. Plus long-range history + an MCP server for AI agents.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    🐹 A free, open-source **macOS system utility** and native GUI for the Mole CLI (mo): clean, uninstall, optimize, analyze disk, and watch live status. Includes long-range history + an MCP server for AI agents.
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening to immediately state the project's core purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > Burrow is an independent open-source project built on the same `mo` engine...
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Burrow is a free, open-source, native macOS GUI for the Mole CLI (`mo`) — clean, uninstall, optimize, analyze disk, and watch live status. It adds long-range history and an MCP server for AI agents. This project is independent and not affiliated with mole.fit.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Introduce a 'Key Features' section in the README, explicitly listing AI agent integration

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Key Features

*   **Native macOS GUI:** Intuitive interface for `mo` CLI functions like cleaning, uninstalling, optimizing, and disk analysis.
*   **Live System Status:** Watch real-time macOS system metrics.
*   **Long-Range History:** Local SQLite database for historical Mac metrics.
*   **MCP Server for AI Agents:** Enables AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, etc.) to query your Mac's activity and status.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface caezium/Burrow
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GrandPerspective
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GrandPerspective · recommended 2×
  2. OnyX · recommended 1×
  3. AppCleaner · recommended 1×
  4. Homebrew · recommended 1×
  5. BleachBit · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best open-source tools for cleaning and optimizing macOS disk space?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OnyX
    2. AppCleaner
    3. GrandPerspective
    4. Homebrew
    5. BleachBit

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named caezium/Burrow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I monitor macOS system status and integrate disk analysis with AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Grafana (grafana/grafana)
    2. Prometheus (prometheus/prometheus)
    3. Node Exporter (prometheus/node_exporter)
    4. GrandPerspective
    5. DaisyDisk
    6. OpenAI API
    7. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    8. Datadog
    9. Datadog Agent
    10. Watchdog
    11. Splunk
    12. Splunk Cloud
    13. Splunk Universal Forwarder
    14. Machine Learning Toolkit
    15. Zabbix (zabbix/zabbix)
    16. Zabbix Agent
    17. Activity Monitor
    18. iStat Menus

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named caezium/Burrow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of caezium/Burrow?
    pass
    AI did not name caezium/Burrow — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts caezium/Burrow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named caezium/Burrow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo caezium/Burrow solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named caezium/Burrow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of caezium/Burrow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/caezium/Burrow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/caezium/Burrow)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/caezium/Burrow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/caezium/Burrow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

caezium/Burrow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite