RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus

Default branch master · commit dabb1a1e · scanned 6/3/2026, 2:57:47 AM

GitHub: 554 stars · 79 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise introductory sentence to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository presents MST++, a Multi-stage Spectral-wise Transformer, which achieved state-of-the-art results in efficient spectral reconstruction and won the NTIRE 2022 Spectral Recovery Challenge. (Insert this sentence after the H1 and any badges/links, before the author list or news section.)
  • mediumabout#2
    Refine the repository description for stronger keyword alignment

    Why:

    CURRENT
    MST++: Multi-stage Spectral-wise Transformer for Efficient Spectral Reconstruction" (CVPRW 2022) & (Winner of NTIRE 2022 Spectral Recovery Challenge) and a toolbox for spectral reconstruction
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    MST++ (Multi-stage Spectral-wise Transformer) is a state-of-the-art deep learning model for efficient spectral reconstruction, recognized at CVPRW 2022 and as the Winner of NTIRE 2022 Spectral Recovery Challenge. This repository provides the model and a comprehensive toolbox for spectral image recovery.
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison with Alternatives
    
    (Add a section here detailing how MST++ compares to other leading methods like HSCNN+, AWAN, and DHP-DIP in terms of performance, efficiency, and architectural innovations for spectral reconstruction.)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
HSCNN+
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. HSCNN+ · recommended 2×
  2. AWAN · recommended 2×
  3. MST++ · recommended 2×
  4. HRNet · recommended 1×
  5. Sparse Spectral Dictionary Learning (SSDL) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective methods for efficient hyperspectral image reconstruction from RGB inputs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HSCNN+
    2. AWAN
    3. MST++
    4. HRNet
    5. Sparse Spectral Dictionary Learning (SSDL)
    6. GP-HSI
    7. NMF-based Hyperspectral Reconstruction

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for state-of-the-art deep learning models for spectral image recovery tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HSCNN+
    2. DHP-DIP
    3. MST++
    4. AWAN
    5. HyperK-Net
    6. SSPSR

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus?
    pass
    AI named caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

caiyuanhao1998/MST-plus-plus — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite