RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner

Default branch main · commit eafa7836 · scanned 6/11/2026, 8:52:39 AM

GitHub: 601 stars · 103 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics for AI-driven security analysis

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, gpt3, security, vulnerability-detection, code-analysis, static-analysis, cybersecurity, ai-security, machine-learning
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, choosing an appropriate open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) and adding its SPDX identifier to the repository settings.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a link to the associated Medium article mentioned in the README as the repository's homepage URL.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Snyk Code
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Snyk Code · recommended 2×
  2. CodeQL · recommended 1×
  3. Checkmarx SAST · recommended 1×
  4. Veracode Static Analysis · recommended 1×
  5. SonarQube · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a tool to automatically detect code security vulnerabilities using artificial intelligence.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Snyk Code
    2. CodeQL
    3. Checkmarx SAST
    4. Veracode Static Analysis
    5. SonarQube
    6. DeepCode AI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need to compare AI-driven static application security testing tools for code analysis.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Snyk Code

    AI recommended 1 alternative but never named chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner?
    pass
    AI did not name chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

chris-koch-penn/gpt3_security_vulnerability_scanner — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite